Here we have an author trying to bridge a huge cultural chasm - the gulf between science and religion. This kind of dialogue is sorely needed.
The Earth we depend on is caught up in an unprecedented storm of global scale challenges. Science provides a window on our planet's natural systems, increasingly stressed by human demands, but too many Americans are in denial.
The tug of war between religion and scientific dogma is extremely destructive. For the sake of our children and generations yet to come, we have to make this right.
The essay below appeared in Yes Magazine, a wonderful resource for life-affirming, progressive inspiration.
________________
Bigger Than Science, Bigger Than
Religion
Sunday, 01 March 2015 10:34 By Richard
Schiffman, YES! Magazine | Op-Ed
The world as we
know it is slipping away. At the current rate of destruction, tropical
rainforest could be gone within as little as 40 years. The seas are being
overfished to the point of exhaustion, and coral reefs are dying from ocean
acidification. Biologists say that we are currently at the start of the largest
mass extinction event since the disappearance of the dinosaurs. As greenhouse
gases increasingly accumulate in the atmosphere, temperatures are likely to
rise faster than our current ecological and agricultural systems can adapt.
It is no secret
that the Earth is in trouble and that we humans are to blame. Just knowing
these grim facts, however, won’t get us very far. We have to transform this
knowledge into a deep passion to change course. But passion does not come
primarily from the head; it is a product of the heart. And the heart is not aroused
by the bare facts alone. It needs stories that weave those facts into a moving
and meaningful narrative.
We need a powerful
new story that we are a part of nature and not separate from it. We need a
story that properly situates humans in the world—neither above it by virtue of
our superior intellect, nor dwarfed by the universe into cosmic insignificance.
We are equal partners with all that exists, co-creators with trees and galaxies
and the microorganisms in our own gut, in a materially and spiritually evolving
universe.
This was the
breathtaking vision of the late Father Thomas Berry. Berry taught that humanity
is presently at a critical decision point. Either we develop a more heart-full
relationship with the Earth that sustains us, or we destroy ourselves and life
on the planet. I interviewed the white-maned theologian (he preferred the term
“geologian,” by which he meant “student of the Earth”) in 1997 at the Riverdale
Center of Religious Research on the Hudson River north of New York City. Berry
spoke slowly and with the hint of a southern drawl, revealing his North
Carolina upbringing.
“I say that my
generation has been autistic,” he told me. “An autistic child is locked into
themselves, they cannot get out and the outer world cannot get in. They cannot
receive affection, cannot give affection. And this is, I think, a very
appropriate way of identifying this generation in its relationship to the
natural world.
“We have no feeling
for the natural world. We’d as soon cut down our most beautiful tree, the most
beautiful forest in the world. We cut it down for what? For timber, for board
feet. We don’t see the tree, we only see it in terms of its commercial value.”
It is no accident
that we have come to our current crisis, according to Berry. Rather, it is the
natural consequence of certain core cultural beliefs that comprise what Berry
called “the Old Story.” At the heart of the Old Story is the idea that we
humans are set apart from nature and here to conquer it. Berry cited the
teaching in Genesis that humans should “subdue the Earth … and have dominion
over every living thing.”
But if religion
provided the outline for the story, science wrote it large—developing a
mind-boggling mastery of the natural world. Indeed, science over time became
the new religion, said Berry, an idolatrous worship of our own human prowess.
Like true believers, many today are convinced that, however bad things might
seem, science and technology will eventually solve all of our problems and
fulfill all of our needs.
Berry acknowledged
that this naive belief in science served a useful purpose during the formative
era when we were still building the modern world and becoming aware of our
immense power to transform things.
Like adolescents
staking out their own place in the world, we asserted our independence from
nature and the greater family of life. But over time, this self-assertion
became unbalanced, pushing the Earth to the brink of environmental cataclysm.
The time has come to leave this adolescent stage behind, said Berry, and
develop a new, mature relationship with the Earth and its inhabitants.
We’ll need to
approach this crucial transition on many different fronts. Scientific research
has too frequently become the willing handmaiden of what Berry called “the
extractive economy,” an economic system that treats our fellow creatures as
objects to be exploited rather than as living beings with their own awareness
and rights. Moreover, technology, in Berry’s view, potentially separates us
from intimacy with life. We flee into “cyberspace”— spending more time on smart
phones, iPods, and video games than communing with the real world.
Science and
technology are not the problem. Our misuse of them is. Berry said that science
needs to acknowledge that the universe is not a random assemblage of dead
matter and empty space, but is alive, intelligent, and continually evolving.
And it needs to recognize that not only is the world alive, it is alive in us.
“We bear the universe in our beings,” Berry reflected, “as the universe bears
us in its being.” In Berry’s view, our human lives are no accident. We are the
eyes, the minds, and the hearts that the cosmos is evolving so that it can come
to know itself ever more perfectly through us.
It’s a view that
has been winning some surprising adherents. Several years ago, I had dinner
with Edgar Mitchell, one of only a dozen humans who have walked upon the lunar
surface. Mitchell, the descendant of New Mexico pioneers and an aeronautical
engineer by training, spoke precisely and almost clinically—until he related an
experience that happened on his way back to Earth during the Apollo 14 mission.
At that point, his voice brightened with awe.
“I was gazing out
of the window, at the Earth, moon, sun, and star-studded blackness of space in
turn as our capsule slowly rotated,” he said. “Gradually, I was flooded with
the ecstatic awareness that I was a part of what I was observing. Every
molecule in my body was birthed in a star hanging in space. I became aware that
everything that exists is part of one intricately interconnected whole.”
The Overview Effect
In a recent phone
chat, Mitchell called this realization “the Overview Effect,” and he said that
virtually all of the moon astronauts experienced it during their flights. In
his case, it changed the direction of his life: “I realized that the story of
ourselves as told by our scientific cosmology and our religion was incomplete
and likely flawed. I saw that the Newtonian idea of separate, independent,
discrete things in the universe wasn’t a fully accurate description.”
In pursuit of a
holistic understanding, Mitchell founded the Institute of Noetic Sciences
(IONS) to explore the nature of human consciousness. The question of
consciousness might seem remote from issues like climate change. But it is
central to the question of how we treat the world. At the core of our abuse of
nature is the belief that we humans are essentially islands unto ourselves,
alienated from the world beyond our skins. A little god locked within the gated
community of his or her own skull won’t feel much responsibility for what goes
on outside.
“The classical
scientific approach says that observation and consciousness are completely
independent of the way the world works,” IONS Chief Scientist Dean Radin told
me. But physics has known for decades that mind and matter are not as separable
as we once supposed. Radin cites as an example Heisenberg’s discovery that the
act of observation changes the phenomenon that is being observed.
Moreover, quantum
physics has shown that subatomic particles that are separated in space are
nevertheless responsive to one another in ways that are not yet fully
understood. We are discovering that there is “some underlying form of
connection in which literally everything is connected to everything else all of
the time,” asserts Radin. “The universe is less a collection of objects than a
web of interrelationships.”
As we come to grasp
how inextricably embedded in this vast web of cosmic life we are, Radin hopes
that humans will be persuaded to move beyond the idea of ourselves as masters
and the world as slave to embrace an equal and mutually beneficial partnership.
Another prophet of
a new scientific paradigm is renowned Harvard biologist Edward (E.O.) Wilson.
Wilson is best known for his biophilia hypothesis, which says there is an
instinctive emotional bond between humans and other life forms. Evolution has
fostered in us the drive to love and care for other living beings, Wilson says,
as a way to promote the survival not just of our own kind but of life as a
whole.
Darwin’s theory of
natural selection is invoked to argue that we humans are conditioned by nature
to struggle tooth and nail for access to limited resources. But Wilson contends
that evolution does not just promote violent competition but also favors the
development of compassion and cooperation—traits that serve the interests of
the group as a whole.
He calls this
radical new idea “group selection.” Groups of altruistically inclined
individuals have an evolutionary advantage over groups that are composed of
members pursuing only their own survival needs. This collective advantage, he
argues, has helped to promote powerful social bonds and cooperative behaviors
in species as diverse as ants, geese, elk, and human beings.
In championing the
evolutionary importance of love and cooperation in the flourishing of life,
Wilson is not just revolutionizing biology. He is also venturing into territory
usually occupied by religion. But, like Berry, Wilson argues that we need a
story that cuts across traditional boundaries between fields to present a new,
integral vision. “Science and religion are two of the most potent forces on
Earth,” Wilson asserts, “and they should come together to save the Creation.”
A thousand-year worldview
At its heart, the
new story that Wilson and Berry advocate is actually a very old one. Indigenous
spiritual traditions taught that all beings are our relatives long before the
science of ecology “discovered” the seamless web of life that binds humans to
other creatures. “The world is alive, everything has spirit, has standing, has
the right to be recognized,” proclaims Anishinaabe activist and former Green
Party candidate for vice president Winona LaDuke.
“One of our
fundamental teachings is that in all our actions we consider the impact it will
have on seven generations,” LaDuke told an audience at the University of Ottawa
in 2012. “Think about what it would mean to have a worldview that could last a
thousand years, instead of the current corporate mindset that can’t see beyond
the next quarterly earnings statement.”
When LaDuke speaks
of Native values, people sometimes ask her what relevance these have for us
today. She answers that the respect for the sacredness of nature that inspired
people to live in harmony with their environment for millennia is not a relic
of the past. It is a roadmap for living lightly on the Earth that we
desperately need in a time of climate change.
This ethic has
spread beyond the reservation into religiously inspired communities, like
Genesis Farm, founded by the Dominican Sisters of Caldwell, New Jersey. Set on
ancestral Lenape lands amidst wooded hills and wetlands and within view of the
Delaware Water Gap, Genesis has served for the last quarter century as an
environmental learning center and working biodynamic farm grounded in Berry’s
vision.
I spoke to the
community’s founder Sister Miriam MacGillis, a friend and student of Berry, in
a room studded with satellite images of the farm and its bioregion. MacGillis
told me that she underwent decades of struggle trying to reconcile Berry’s
13-billion-year vision of an evolutionary cosmos with the ultimately
incompatible biblical teachings that “creation is finished: Humans were made,
history began, there was the fall, and history will end with the apocalypse.”
She says, “The pictures I had of God were too small, too parochial, too much a
reflection of the ways humans think. We made God in our image!”
Taking the long
view fundamentally transforms the basis for environmental action, says
MacGillis: “We need to realize that we are the universe in the form of the
human. We are not just on Earth to do good ecological things. That is where the
religious perspective takes us with the stewardship model—take care of it; it’s
holy because God made it. That hasn’t worked real well … The idea of
stewardship is too small, it’s too human-centered, like we can do that. It’s
really the opposite. Earth is taking total care of us.”
Genesis Farm has
propagated these ideas through its Earth Literacy training, which has now
spread to many places throughout the world. Their work is a small part of a
larger greening of religion, says Yale religious scholar Mary Evelyn Tucker,
co-creator with Brian Swimme of Journey of the Universe, an exhilarating trek
through time and space portraying an evolutionary universe.
Tucker expects that
the upcoming encyclical on climate change and the environment that Pope Francis
will issue in early 2015 will be “a game changer” for Catholics. She adds that
Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew has also been outspoken, labeling crimes
against the natural world “a sin.” The Dalai Lama, for his part, has been
speaking about the importance of safeguarding the environment based on
Buddhism’s sense of the profound interdependence of all life. China has
recently enshrined in its constitution the need for a new ecological
civilization rooted in Confucian values, which preach the harmony between
humans, Earth, and Heaven.
“All civilizations
have drawn on the wisdom traditions that have gotten people through death,
tragedy, destruction, immense despair,” says Tucker, adding that we are
currently in a perilous rite of passage. “We will need all of the world’s
religions to help as well as a shared sense of an evolutionary story to get us
through this.”
This piece was reprinted by Truthout
with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without
permission or license from the source.
Richard Schiffman is the author of two
biographies as well as a journalist whose work has appeared in The New York
Times, Salon, The Washington Post, The Christian Science Monitor, The
Huffington Post, and on NPR and Monitor Radio.
Packers and Movers Gurgaon
ReplyDeleteDissemble Furniture
Some pieces of furniture can be taken apart. You would be wise to do that when you have to move bigger pieces. Things like bed frames are best taken apart and then loaded in the removal van or you will have a really hard time moving them. Sofas are a tricky cookie, so it would be best to keep them whole unless they are of the simple design that can be dissembled easily.